Skip to content

1.2 Organisations’ Disability Rates and Reporting

Latest Data: 2020

This page reviews the differences between what organisations and individuals report regarding disabilities.

Highlights

Share this Research

In 2020, data were gathered on disabled staff from employers, as has been the cases since the 2002/03 Profiling the Profession project.

However, the 2020 project, for the first time, also surveyed individuals and asked about their disability statuses. This was done to determine if all disabled staff report their disabilities to their employer(s); not all do, which is their right. Employers reported that 2.8% of archaeologists working for them in 2019-20 were disabled, while 10.5% of individual archaeologists reported that they were disabled, almost three and a half times the level that employers were aware of, but slightly lower than the overall representation of disabled people in the UK workforce.

Table 1.2.1: Respondent organisation’s staff and the UK workforce who identify as disabled, 2002-2020. Individual responses for 2020 included. UK Workforce data covers employed people with disabilities defined under the Equality Act 2010, aged 16-64, and are from the Office of National Statistics: “A08: Labour market status of disabled people“. Changes to how ONS collected data in 2013 led to an increase in the number of reported disabled people.

Staff members 2002-03 Organisations 2007-08 Organisations 2012-13 Organisations 2019-20 Organisations 2019-20 Individuals
Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage Count Percentage
Archaeologists – Disabled 10 0% 38 2% 14 2% 82 3% 105 11%
Archaeologists – Not disabled 2,427 100% 2,285 98% 785 98% 2,824 97% 894 90%
UK Workforce – Disabled 10% 12% 14% 13%
Archaeologists – Total 2,437 2,323 799 2,906 999

Download this table:

Extrapolation of past trends

While it is likely that under-reporting occurred in the past and that the true number of disabled archaeologists was higher than reported in previous Profiling the Profession reports (all only asked employers), the authors are unaware of any data that could be used to determine the shape of that potential under-reporting, so any discussion will be speculation at this point. Other work in this area also only surveyed employers and not individuals (Employing People with Disabilities: Good Practice Guidance for Archaeologists. Tim Phillips & John Creighton 2010).

Assigning Motivation

Caution should be taken with speculatively assigning motivation to why some archaeologists do not report their disabilities to their employers. In future Profiling the Profession projects it might be possible to ask questions to better understand why this occurs.

Image Credits

On Site with Operation Nightingale and Breaking Ground Heritage by Wessex Archaeology. From Flickr CC BY NC 2.0

Version control and change log

As a digital document we may update parts of this page in the future to account for corrections or the need for clarification. Please use the version when citing:

Version: 1.0

Change log: no changes

CREDITS

Title: Profiling the Profession

2020 Authors: Kenneth Aitchison, Poppy German and Doug Rocks-Macqueen

Published by: Landward Research Ltd

Version Date: 2021

ISBN: 978-0-9572452-8-0

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14333387

License: CC BY SA 4.0 for all text and figures. Header images are from different sources check image credits for their specific licensing.

2020 funders: Historic England, with support from Historic Environment Scotland, CIfA and FAME.

Questions about Profiling the Profession: enquiries@landward.eu